$24,736 in Google Ads. $236,801 in revenue. Most of it closed on the phone.
How we built a demand-generation Google Ads program for a US commercial espresso-equipment supplier, and why the real return showed up in the client's own phone sales, not only in the platform dashboard.
The brief
Vera Coffee Solutions sells commercial espresso equipment - La Marzocco, Modbar, Eversys and related machines - to cafes and wholesale buyers across the US. These are considered, four- and five-figure purchases.
Prospects research online, but the actual deal is almost always finalised over a phone call with a sales rep, not through a web checkout. That single fact shaped everything: standard online conversion tracking was never going to capture where the money actually came in.
Demand was online. Revenue was offline.
Long, human sales cycle
Five-figure equipment is not bought on impulse. Buyers compare, ask questions and close by phone, sometimes days or weeks after the click.
Tracking only saw the surface
The pixel captured clicks and add-to-cart intent, but phone-closed sales never flowed back into Google Ads. The dashboard understated true performance.
Multiple US markets
Demand had to be generated and defended across distinct regions, including New York, Texas and California, each with its own competitive picture.
A demand engine designed to feed a phone-based sales team
Performance Max as the demand driver
PMax across the US (ex-NYC) carried the bulk of the program, surfacing qualified buyers and generating add-to-cart intent at roughly $1.41 per action.
Market-by-market expansion
A dedicated PMax build extended reach into Texas as a second high-value region, keeping budgets and signals separated from the core US campaign.
Branded search protection
Brand and branded-product Search captured buyers already looking for Vera, holding click-through rates of 17-19% and keeping competitors off the brand term.
Remarketing toward the call
Warm prospects from add-to-cart and product views were re-engaged and nurtured, bridging the gap between product research and the phone close.
Online tracking captured demand. Offline records captured revenue.
The revenue figures below come from the client's own offline sales records: deals their team closed by phone, confirmed in writing. We report them as Client-reported, separate from Platform-tracked Google Ads metrics.
Where the program landed
January - December 2024, US market. Source labels are preserved exactly: platform-tracked metrics came from Google Ads, while revenue and phone-closed deals were reported by the client.
"Over the past 12 months: 77 leads closed via phone calls from Google Ads, and $236,801 in generated revenue - all in addition to the direct orders generated from the ads."
Vera Coffee Solutions - performance summary shared in writing
Every figure, with its source
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Google Ads spend | $24,736.76 | Platform-tracked |
| Clicks | 26,411 | Platform-tracked |
| Average CPC | $0.94 | Platform-tracked |
| Add-to-cart actions | 12,106 | Platform-tracked |
| Cost per add-to-cart (PMax US) | $1.41 | Platform-tracked |
| Branded search CTR | Up to 19% | Platform-tracked |
| Deals closed by phone | 77 | Client-reported |
| Average value per closed deal | ~$3,075 | Client-reported |
| Revenue generated | $236,801 | Client-reported |
| Return on ad spend | ~9.6x | Client-reported |
ROAS is calculated as client-reported revenue ($236,801) against total ad spend ($24,736.76), and excludes additional direct online orders the client noted but did not quantify.
How each piece earned its place
| Campaign | Role in the funnel |
|---|---|
| PMax - US (ex-NYC) | Primary demand engine, driving the bulk of add-to-cart intent at ~$1.41 each. |
| PMax - Texas | Expansion into a second high-value region with isolated budget and signals. |
| Branded Search | Captured in-market buyers and defended the brand term, with 17-19% CTR. |
| Shopping | Product-level visibility across the equipment catalog. |
| Remarketing | Re-engaged warm prospects and nudged them toward a phone close. |
Why the dashboard told only half the story
For high-ticket B2B equipment, the sale closes where the conversation happens: on the phone, not at an online checkout. By optimising for qualified demand at $1.41 per add-to-cart and feeding that intent into remarketing, the program delivered a steady flow of buyers the client's team converted offline.
That revenue - $236,801 across 77 deals - never touched the conversion pixel, which is exactly why we report it from the client's own records rather than presenting it as platform-tracked revenue.
- Phone-based sales team fed with high-intent demand.
- 77 high-ticket deals closed from Google Ads-generated leads.
- Branded demand protected while PMax expanded reach.
- Measurement kept transparent by separating platform and client-reported sources.
Offline revenue needs an online demand system built around how sales actually close
For Vera Coffee Solutions, Google Ads did not need to act like a simple e-commerce checkout machine. It needed to create qualified demand, protect high-intent branded searches and keep warm buyers moving until they were ready to talk to sales.
Build paid media around what actually closes
If your real revenue happens on the phone or in the field, we build paid programs that generate the demand and measure them against business outcomes.
Talk to Full Out Global